Corruption and Democracy

Distinctions between appropriate and inappropriate interferences of the public and the private in Colombia: 1992-2011

Corruption and Democracy

Distinctions between appropriate and inappropriate interferences of the public and the private in Colombia: 1992-2011

117,69 €*

in Vorbereitung

Falls Sie eine Lieferung außerhalb DE, AT oder CH wünschen, nutzen Sie bitte unser Kontaktformular für eine Anfrage.

The literature has highlighted the tensions between democracy and anti-corruption efforts, considering their changing meanings over time. These debates have been traversed by understandings of how to ensure appropriate connections between the public and the private, bearing in mind some of their alternative meanings (e.g., for the public as the state, the commons, manifest or impersonal- reasonable interests). Colombia faced these debates at two critical junctures, which led Congress to pass party and anti-corruption laws in both time periods. To contribute to the understanding of these puzzling tensions, the research aimed to solve the following question: Why did Colombian legislators understand some public-private relations as adequate for Colombian democracy, while others as corrupt in the approval of the 1992-1995 and 2010-2011 party and anti-corruption laws, and why did these understandings change? Solving this question required consulting the literature that has addressed the discussion points on democratization, corruption and the public-private. This, in order to guide the diachronic comparison. The sampling material was composed by the transcription of the debates in Congress that ended in the approval of the mentioned laws, following a qualitative content analysis. It was observed that the congresspeople tended to modify their emphasis of the democratic and non-corrupt: from the protection of the common to the impersonal-reasonable interests.



Introduction

The Method
From democracy to democratization
Addressing contests regarding the meaning of corruption in contemporary times
Colombian context and the beginning of the 1990s and the 2010s
Law 130 of 1994. More political parties for a pluralist democracy
Law 190 of 1995. Corruption as an immoral generalized behavior
Law 1474 of 2011. Corruption propelled by elites and office holders
Law 1475 of 2011. Designing parties to promote a more egalitarian democracy
The comparison: Democracy and corruption as distortion through public-private relations
Conclusions.


ISBN 978-3-658-52011-3
Medientyp Buch
Copyrightjahr 2026
Verlag Springer, Berlin
Abbildungen XVII, 615 p. 1 illus. Textbook for German language market.
Sprache Englisch